Moore v. Humboldt County
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*223By the Court,
Coleman, J.:
This action is brought to recover an amount alleged to be due the plaintiff for services rendered as constable of Union township, Humboldt County, Nevada, for a period of a little more than two months It is alleged in the complaint that at the time of plaintiff’s appointment the salary of said office was $150 per month, and that thereafter the legislature passed an act, which was approved by the governor, fixing the salary at $5 per annum. It is also alleged that a claim in due form was presented to the board of county commissioners .for the amount alleged to be due,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Perry v. ArringtonNevada Supreme Court · 1884
- State v. TilfordNevada Supreme Court · 1865
- State Ex Rel. McNamee v. SpinnerNevada Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crawford v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Caldwell v. Board of Regents of University of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Shamberger v. FerrariNevada Supreme Court · 1957
- Moore v. Humboldt CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1925
- Bonaventura v. Bd. of Cnty. CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.