Legal Opinion
U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hamlin
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 5, 1958No. 37223PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
There is as stated in the preceding statement of facts no issue as to whether the award was supported by evidence except that the plaintiff in error contends there was not sufficient competent evidence in the record to prove the deceased was when accidently injured performing a service in the course and scope of his employment.
It is elementary that an injury compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act must be caused by an accident both arising out of and occurring in the course of the claimant’s employment. Code (Ann.) § 114-102.
It is held by this court in Georgia Ry. &…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. SockwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Fulmer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. CloreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Cooley v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mayor and Aldermen of Savannah v. StevensSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Pike v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Cabin Crafts, Inc. v. PelfreyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Olde South Custom Landscaping, Inc. v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. SoutherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.