Legal Opinion

Stuchell v. Mortland

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 7, 1973No. 1362-1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.

This appeal concerns principally the right of a sublessor to remove a sublessee’s improvements erected during the sublease term after the sublessee has failed to remove his improvements within the period stipulated for that purpose in the sublease.

The facts are briefly these. On October 1, 1944, lessees Mortland 1 executed a written lease with the Indian heirs of Charley Farmer of recreational real estate known as Tu-lalip Shores in Snohomish County, Washington, for a term which the parties agree expired July 6, 1970. The lease expressly bound the parties thereto and their respective…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Universal Insurance v. RansonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. City of Greenville v. Washington American League Baseball ClubSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  3. Swak v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Nelson v. Nelson Neal Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Puget Investment Co. v. WenckWashington Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fuller Market Basket, Inc. v. Gillingham & Jones, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. Stevenson v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. Paulina Lake Historic Cabin Owners Ass'n v. U.S.D.A. Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1983
  4. Tulalip Shores, Inc. v. MortlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. Harrison v. Emerald Outdoor Advertising (In Re Emerald Outdoor Advertising)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API