Legal Opinion

Littlejohn v. Smith

Cherokee Nation Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2015No. SC-2014-02PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

The Defendants/Appellants, seek review of the trial court’s judgment in favor of PlaintifRAppellee, J. Dewayne Littlejohn. The sole issue before this court is the question of whether the Cherokee Nation has waived sovereign immunity. See Littlejohn v. Smith, 5 Am. Tribal Law 7 (2004). This matter being a question of law, the Court will review the issue de novo.

The district court, relying on Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 28 S.Ct. 441, 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908), Wilcoxen v. Byrd, JAT-98-16-B, 1999 WL 33589128 (1999), Vann v. Salazar, 2011 WL 4953030 (D.D.C.2011), Cherokee Nation Constitution…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Vann v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Littlejohn v. SmithCherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Channing v. Seneca-Cayuga NationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API