Legal Opinion

Andruss v. Nieto

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1940No. 9386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.. „ , , . Appellee brought an action against apPellant in the District Court of the United Stat£s for the Northern District of Cali. fomi Southerr] Diy¡sio recoyer ,dam_ for ml A ■ hav¡ been waived ^ trial de¿ b'fore th| CQUrt without a . * From jud t entered ^ fayor of appellee> app¿lla°t ap. peals.

The facts in the case are substantially as follows:

Respondent, Philip Nieto, was injured on November 3, 1934, when struck by an automobile being driven by appellant, N. F. *251Andruss. The accident occurred'between 5:15 and 5:30 p. m. Appellant was driving easterly on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. HollanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Scheuermann v. KuetemeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. United States of America, and Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Isaac MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Alexander v. CoreyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API