Legal Opinion
Colonial Hardwood Flooring Co. v. International Union United Furniture Workers of America
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 16, 1948No. Civ. 3804PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
The complaint in this case is in two counts. Count 1 is based on section 301 of the recent Act of Congress known as the Labor Management Relations Act, Public Law 101, 80th Cong, c. 120, 29 U.S.C.A. § 185, passed by the House and Senate June 23, 1947 over Presidential veto.
Section 301 (a) authorizes suits for violation of contracts between employer and the labor organization representing employees in an industry affecting commerce, to be brought in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the parties, without respect to the amount in controversy…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Shanferoke Coal & Supply Corp. v. Westchester Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Engineers, Chemists & Technicians, Local 231District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Schatte v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture MacHine Operators of United States and CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Textile Workers Union v. American Thread Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
- Shirley-Herman Co., Inc. v. International Hod Carriers, Building & Common Laborers Union of America, Local Union No. 210Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local Union No. 25, A.F.L. v. W. L. Mead, Inc., (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.