Legal Opinion

Black v. Southern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 29, 1934No. 23155PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. While it is true that, under section 5517 of the Civil Code (1910), “an action for a tort must, in general, be brought in the name of the person whose legal right has been affected, and who was legally interested in the property at the time the injury thereto was committed,” especially where an action is founded on a direct invasion of some legal right such as a suit in trover or for trespass, an exception exists, as set forth in section 4408 of the Civil Code (1910), that, “if the tort results from the violation of a duty, itself the consequences of a contract, the right of action is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carter v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Allen v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. MikoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Meinhard, Schaul & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API