Legal Opinion

Prime v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1941No. S. F. 16541PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Board of Governors of The State Bar of California made on October 25, 1940, that petitioner be disbarred. On April 15, 1940, a notice to show cause was issued by Local Administrative Committee No. 5 for the City and County of San Francisco, charging petitioner with professional misconduct in violating his oath and duties as an attorney at law as prescribed by sections 6067, 6068 and 6103 of the Business & Professions Code, Rule 9 of the Rules of Professional Conduct (commingling of clients’ funds with his own), and in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marsh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Kennedy v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. KraschelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. McComb v. COMM. ON JUD. PERFORMANCECalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In Re CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Herron v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API