Legal Opinion
Fernandez-Roque v. Smith
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided October 15, 1984No. Civ. A. C81-1084A, C81-938A and C81-1350APublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHOOB, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this case are those Cubans who arrived in the United States as part of the 1980 “Freedom Flotilla” and who were, are, or will be incarcerated at the Atlanta Penitentiary. Fernandez-Roque v. Smith, 91 F.R.D. 117, 122-24, as modified, 91 F.R.D. 239, 240 n. 1 (N.D.Ga.1981). Presently before the Court is plaintiffs’ “Second Renewed Motion for Habeas Corpus,” pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(b), seeking judicial review of their final orders of exclusion. Specifically, plaintiffs have petitioned the Court to review the November 30,1983 decisions of the Board of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Djordje Kovac v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, John P. Boyd, District Director, Seattle, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Rafael Fernandez-Roque v. William French Smith, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Erodina Urbano De Malaluan v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Evangelina Igno Reyes v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moises Garcia-Mir v. William French SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Beatrice Ananeh-Firempong v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Perez-Perez v. HanberryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- BARRERABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- GARCIA-MIR Et Al. v. SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.