Cannon v. Dillehay
Alabama Court of Appeals
Appeal from Circuit Court, Morgan County; 'Robert C. Bricliell, Judge. Action by W. D. Cannon, Jr., against H. W. Dillehay and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. . The amount of discount does not indicate had faith. 80 Ala. 262; 120 Ala. 493, 24 South. 959. Dillehay’s action constituted negligence as to any subsequent innocent purchaser of the paper. 106 Ala. 535, 18 South. 154; 120 Ala. 493, 24 South. 959; 18 Ala. 227.
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The submission of this case was had in conformity to rule 46 of the Supreme Court (178 Ala. xix, 65 South, vii), and the case decided by the court sitting en banc, before the preparation of an opinion.
The plaintiff’s action is grounded on four promissory notes dated May 9, 1914, the first three for $140 each, and the last for $130, payable, one, two, three, and four months after date, for value received, and payable to the order of Brenard Manufacturing Company, of Iowa City, Iowa. Plaintiff claims to be the owner of the notes by purchase, for a valuable consideration, in due course and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cline v. GuthrieIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Capital City Insurance v. QuinnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Flansberg v. Heywood Bros. & Wakefield Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Costelo v. BarnardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
3Cited by9 opinions
- Interstate Bankers Corp. v. KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Seier v. PeekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- McCain v. P.A. Partners Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Deshazo v. L. & E. LamarAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
- Dillehay Bros. v. CannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.