Legal Opinion

State v. Austin

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 25, 1990No. 89-321PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The State of Vermont appeals from a trial court grant of defendant’s motion to suppress statements made to the police about alleged charges of sexual abuse, following a polygraph test. We reverse and remand.

Defendant was arrested on September 12,1988 on a charge of sexually assaulting a child, in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 3252(a)(3). Defendant filed a motion to suppress certain incriminating statements made to the police following a polygraph examination, asserting that he was not given his Miranda rights, that the statements were either involuntary or not made by him, and that, in any case,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. StanislawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Herbert Levi Ferguson v. F. C. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  4. State v. MalinowskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  5. State v. ZehnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ClearySupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  2. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. State v. ClearySupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. State v. IvesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  5. State v. IvesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API