Legal Opinion

Payette v. Dickman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 28, 2010No. 09-3291PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Wisconsin inmate Allen Payette claimed that officials at Marathon County Jail in Wausau, Wisconsin, were deliberately indifferent to his serious mental health needs. A jury concluded otherwise. Pay-ette appeals and we affirm.

Payette’s suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arises from his confinement between March and October 2006. As relevant here, we previously ruled that a trial was needed to resolve Payette’s claim that jail administrator Bob Dickman and corrections supervisor Seth Wiskow deliberately refused to provide Payette with recommended mental health treatment. See Payette v. Hoenisch,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Sally Naeem v. McKesson Drug Company and Dan MontreuilCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Cephus Bell v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Egonmwan v. Cook County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Elijah Stanciel v. Richard B. Gramley, Captain Knight, and Sergeant EatonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boykin v. Dixon Mental Health ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Boykin v. EnloeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  3. Cook v. Wexford Healthcare ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API