Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Roob

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 2008No. 49A02-0801-CV-23PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

A class composed of persons who applied for Medicaid, were denied, and ap pealed the denial brought an action against the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration (“FSSA”). The class alleged FSSA violated the due process rights of Medicaid claimants with its policy that prohibits claimants from offering at the appeal hearing evidence of their disabilities that was not included in the initial application. The trial court granted FSSA’s motion to dismiss. We reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Medicaid is a federal-state cooperative program to provide medical…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Russell v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State v. MadisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. Godby v. WhiteheadIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CurtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Indiana Family & Social Services Administration v. PickettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Murphy v. CurtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Murphy v. CurtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API