Legal Opinion

Steerman v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1960No. 38569PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

Code § 81-1305 provides: “In all suits by or against partners, or where any two or more persons shall sue or be sued in the same action, and the name of any person who ought to be joined in such action as plaintiff or defendant shall be omitted, the omission may, on motion, be supplied by adding the proper party instanter.” This section does not mean that one defendant can make a defendant another party, who is liable over to him. The facts in the case of Frost v. Smith, 148 Ga. 840 (98 S. E. 471) relied on by the plaintiff, are not comparable to the facts of the present…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamner v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. Frost v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. LuttrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Peacock Construction Co. v. Turner Concrete, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API