Legal Opinion
(PC) Barnes v. Supreme Court Judges
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 3, 2021No. 1:21-cv-01078Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Case No. 1:21-cv-01078-NONE-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION 13 v. 14 SUPREME COURT JUDGES, et al., (ECF No. 12) 15 Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff Antoine Deshawn Barnes (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis 18 in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on July 12, 19 2021, was screened and Plaintiff was granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s amended…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.