Legal Opinion

Richard Presley and Tina Presley v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided March 27, 2008No. 02-07-00245-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-07-245-CV

RICHARD PRESLEY AND APPELLANTS

TINA PRESLEY

V

SEARS ROEBUCK & CO. APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

------------

Appellants Richard Presley and Tina Presley (ARichard,@ ATina,@ or collectively, AAppellants@) appeal from the trial court=s granting of summary judgment in favor of Appellee Sears Roebuck & Co. (ASears@). In two issues, Appellants argue that the trial court erred by granting the summary judgment on limitations and standing grounds. We will affirm.

American…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API