Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*760The plaintiff met his burden in moving for summary judgment by establishing, prima facie, that he was the designated beneficiary under a Pathmark 401k Savings Plan (hereinafter the Plan) maintained by his former wife, now deceased (hereinafter the decedent), as an employee of the defendant Pathmark Stores, Inc., formerly known as Supermarkets General Corporation (hereinafter Pathmark) (see Storozynski v Storozynski, 10 AD3d 419 [2004]). In opposition, the appellant, the estate of the decedent (hereinafter the Estate), failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Contrary to the Estate’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Silber v. SilberNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Eredics v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Valentin v. New York City Police Pension FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Storozynski v. StorozynskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Diversified Investment Advisors, Inc. v. BaruchDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API