Legal Opinion

Delta Township v. Eyde

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1972No. Docket 11113PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, P. J.

The Township of Delta brought this action under MCLA 213.21 et seq; MSA 8.11 et seq, seeking to condemn an easement across the defendants’ property for the purpose of laying a sewer line. The trial court directed a verdict on the question of the necessity of the project but allowed the question of the necessity of the route chosen and the amount of compensation to go to the jury. The plaintiff was granted an easement 50 *488feet wide and sufficient area for construction. Defendants were compensated in the amount of $6,-000 and they appeal. We affirm.

The defendants contend that it was error to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Dolby v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Arrand v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Consumers Power Co. v. Allegan State Bank Appeal of Nieneker TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. State Highway Commissioner v. McCarthyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kucken v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Haynes v. Monroe Plumbing & Heating Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Master Craft Engineering, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. City of St. Ignace v. McFarlaneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Eyde v. State of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API