Legal Opinion
Rainko v. Webster-Eisenlohr, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1943No. Docket No. 1, Calendar No. 42,268PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
Plaintiff, a skilled worker in a cigar factory, was awarded compensation by the department of labor and industry. The employer and the carrier of its insurance have appealed. The record sustains in all its material aspects the finding of the department from which we quote:
“The plaintiff, Elizabeth Rainko, was employed by defendant, Webster-Eisenlohr, Inc., as a cigar roller. She worked as a piece worker, earning on the average of $4.05 per day. Her particular place of work was located on the second floor of defendant’s plant. On February 20, 1941, she came to-work as usual, apparently in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Adams v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- La Veck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Twork v. Munising Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by12 opinions
- Robertson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Carter v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Pathfinder Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Seitz v. L & R INDUSTRIES, INC., ETC.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
- Beltinck v. Mt. Pleasant State Home & Training SchoolMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.