Legal Opinion

Collucci v. Eklund

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 2000No. Docket No. 210924PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s order that granted defendants’ motion for summary disposition on the basis that plaintiff’s claim is barred by the release he signed. We affirm.

I. FACTS and proceedings

Plaintiff was the human resources manager at the Westland facility of Textron Automotive Company. Defendant Lisa Eklund worked under his supervision and defendant Louisa Muldoon also worked at the *656Westland facility. In June 1996, Eklund complained to her employer of sexual harassment by plaintiff, and accordingly Textron conducted an investigation. In the course of the investigation, Muldoon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stefanac v. Cranbrook Educational CommunityMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Gortney v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Dresden v. Detroit MacOmb Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Romska v. OpperMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Rinke v. Automotive Moulding Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Computer Network, Inc. v. AM General Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Madison District Public Schools v. MyersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Adair v. State of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Collucci v. EklundMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Gascho v. Scheurer HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API