Legal Opinion
Ravinskas v. Karalekas
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 16, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-3327 SSHPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss. Upon consideration of defendants’ motion, plaintiff’s opposition, and defendants’ reply, defendants’ motion is denied.
Plaintiff is a female former employee of Karalekas & McCahill, a local law firm. Her complaint alleges the following: When she had been working at Karalekas & McCahill for about four years, she began a sexual relationship with Mr. Karalekas, the sole proprietor of the firm. This relationship continued for a number of years. From 1987 to 1989, plaintiff made…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Goos v. National Ass'n of RealtorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Thomas v. News World CommunicationsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- Thompson v. International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- Day v. Sidley & AustinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arthur Young & Co. v. SutherlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Nelson-Cole v. Borg-Warner Security Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995