State v. Fry
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
Police officers encountered defendant and three companions sitting in a parked car. Also in the car were three syringes that contained methamphetamine residue, as well as several syringes and a drug preparation kit that were not tested. At trial, after the court denied defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal and his motion to compel the state to specify which syringe or syringes he allegedly possessed, defendant was convicted of possession of a Schedule II controlled substance. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of those motions. Because we conclude that the evidence was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. OareOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. CoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. WrisleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. SaudeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. BordenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. KulickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. TaciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.