Doheny v. Kohler
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The axiom “Hope springs eternal” is particularly true where there is a chance of gain and no risk of loss. So it is not unusual for a divorce litigant to stipulate to a proposed division of estate in a divorce action, and, subsequently, to repent of the bargain made. Given such change of heart and mind, it is not unusual for an action to be brought seeking a modifica tion of the divorce judgment as to division of estate, even though such division was based on a joint stipulation of husband and wife in the divorce proceeding. That is the situation here. With new counsel engaged to seek and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Boring v. OttWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Paschong v. HollenbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Fischbeck v. MielenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- State Ex Rel. Gaudynski v. PrussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Conrad v. ConradWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Ennis v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979