Legal Opinion

Doheny v. Kohler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1977No. 75-380PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

The axiom “Hope springs eternal” is particularly true where there is a chance of gain and no risk of loss. So it is not unusual for a divorce litigant to stipulate to a proposed division of estate in a divorce action, and, subsequently, to repent of the bargain made. Given such change of heart and mind, it is not unusual for an action to be brought seeking a modifica tion of the divorce judgment as to division of estate, even though such division was based on a joint stipulation of husband and wife in the divorce proceeding. That is the situation here. With new counsel engaged to seek and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Boring v. OttWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Paschong v. HollenbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Fischbeck v. MielenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State Ex Rel. Gaudynski v. PrussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Conrad v. ConradWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ennis v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API