Legal Opinion

Benton v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 11, 1989No. 01-88-00475-CRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of burglary, found two enhancement paragraphs true, and assessed punishment at 55 years confinement.

In his only point of error, appellant contends there is a fatal variance between the enhancement allegations and the State’s proof at trial. Because of an error in the date of the second enhancement allegation, he argues the jury’s finding of true to the enhancement paragraphs violated Tex.Penal Code Ann. sec. 12.42(d) (Vernon Supp. 1989).

Section 12.42(d) permits the State to classify defendant as a habitual felony offender if it can prove…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Freda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Simmons v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  2. Earl v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  3. Harrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Austin Wilson Bradford v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2025
  5. Collesano, Kevin Michael v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API