Hindman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is speeding; the punishment was assessed at $25.00 following a trial de novo in the District Court.
The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal since the fine was less than $100.00. The 18th. Legislature, by Tex. Laws 1883, ch. 35, at 24, diminished the criminal jurisdiction of the County Court of Comal County and vested the District Court with criminal jurisdiction theretofore vested in said County Court.
Appellant contends that this Court has jurisdiction to entertain this appeal because of Art. 4.03, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.
The question has been decided…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888
- Monroe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miller v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- State v. WeinzerlMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973