Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Moulton, David Len

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 2013No. PD-1889-11Published

1Concurrence

OPINION

COCHRAN, J.,

filed a concurring opinion.

I agree that the trial judge did not err when he instructed the jury on the “unknown” manner and means of committing murder. I write separately because I believe that this area' of law has become overly formalististic and divorced from its original purpose of giving notice to the defendant.

The common-law rule1 of including an allegation of a “manner and means unknown to the grand jury” in an indictment when no one knows exactly how an offense was committed ensures that the State *812gives the defendant as much notice as it can about its theory of how…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Studer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Sanchez, OrlandoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. People v. CroninCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. People v. SteventonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API