Legal Opinion

Metz v. State Hasenour v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1940No. Nos. 27,390 and 27,391, respectivelyPublished

1Opinion of the CourtTremain, J.

These are appeals from convictions on a grand jury indictment based on §§ 10-1410 and 10-1411, Burns’ 1933, §§2893, 2894, Baldwin’s 1934, charging appellants with failure to support their father. The three appellants were indicted jointly.

Upon their'arrest the appellants filed a joint verified plea in abatement, wherein they alleged that they were subpoenaed and compelled to appear before the grand jury and testify under oath; that they had no attorney and did not know their rights with reference to such testimony; that they were questioned by the grand jury concerning the offense charged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ComerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Atkinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State v. PenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Overman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. McHugh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API