Mryszuk v. Hoyos
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE GREIMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
Following an ex parte bench trial in which defense counsel failed to appear at the appropriate time, defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of a motion to reconsider judgment. However, we find the trial court abused its discretion when it denied defendant’s motion to vacate. Pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 366 (107 Ill. 2d R. 366), we reverse the trial court’s decision as to defendant’s motion to vacate and remand for new trial.
This litigation arises from an automobile accident plaintiff and defendant had in 1980.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Marriage of SanbornAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- In Re Marriage of SheberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Harris v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- In Re Marriage of PotterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- Higgens v. HouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Babcock v. WallaceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. EichwedelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Industrial Steel Construction Inc. v. MooncotchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Wolkowitz v. JamisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.