Christy v. Ulrich
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued for damages for personal injuries. The state of California intervened as plaintiff’s employer, but it was stipulated that but one award should be made and the cause went to trial before a jury; A ver diet for plaintiff was returned in the sum of $55,000 and the defendants appeal upon typewritten transcripts.
On October 18, 1927, plaintiff was acting under the employment of the state of California as resident engineer in charge of the construction of a state highway bridge acrossLos Positos Creek in Alameda County by the defendant Ulrich under a state contract. In the course of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kennedy v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Meindersee v. MeyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Pickwick v. McCauliffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Oles v. Kahn Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Foster v. A. P. Jacobs & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Koppelman v. Ambassador Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Young v. Bates Valve Bag Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.