Legal Opinion

Grynberg v. BP P.L.C.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 27, 2012No. Civil Action No. H-11-1731PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVID HITTNER, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are the Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and for Insufficiency of Service of Process, or in the Alternative, to Quash Service filed by Peter Sutherland and Lord John Browne, The BP Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint, and the Motion to Dismiss of Statoil, ASA. Having considered the motions, submissions, and applicable law, the Court determines that all of the motions should be granted.

/. BACKGROUND

This case arises under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pike v. Office of Alcohol & Tobacco ControlDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2015
  2. Contango Operators, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  3. David Wilson v. Gerald BirnbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  4. Grynberg v. Bp P.L.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Sherry Parker v. United-Bilt Homes, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API