Legal Opinion

Clinckett v. Casseres

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 24, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kelby, J.: ■

The order appealed from struck out eacn of the four defenses referred to in the statement of facts. The first three defenses were stricken out on the ground that they were “ not germane ” to the issues; and the fourth defense on the ground that it was a mere legal conclusion.

After the plaintiff had moved to strike out the defendant’s separate defenses, the defendant served motion papers to dismiss the complaint. The parties, by written stipulation in the record, ask the court to determine whether the complaint states a cause of action. The complaint will be first considered, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Urtz v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Stillwell v. . StaplesNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Van Pelt v. BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sapinkopf v. Cunard Steamship Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Saunders v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API