Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 27, 1916No. 5027PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; George W. Clark, Judge. Action by George Dixon, administrator of the estate of Theodore E. Dixon, deceased, against the State Mutual Insurance Company. There was a judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CLAY, C.

Plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, brought suit against the defendant in error as defendant, in the district court of Oklahoma county, to recover on an insurance policy issued for $1,500 to Theodore Dixon, dated October 14, 1909, insuring a certain barn against loss by fire, alleging the total destruction of said barn by fire on the 26th day of April, 1909, that proof of loss and notice were given on the 14th day of September, 1909, according to and in compliance with the provisions of the policy, and attaching a copy of the policy sued on as an exhibit to the petition.

Plainti…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Hastings v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Harding v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Corrugated Culvert Co. v. Simpson Tp., McIntosh Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Moloney v. . NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kiniry v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Hutchings v. ZumbrunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. In Re Cherokee Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  4. Dickinson v. OrrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  5. Tibbetts v. Sight 'N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API