Legal Opinion

State v. Hendricks

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Cole Circuit Court. — Hon. B. G. ’Thurmond, Special Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, J.

The defendants were jointly indicated for practicing medicine without a license from *661the State Board of Health in violation of section 8315, Revised Statutes 1909. They were prosecuted jointly and, after a trial, the .jury returned a verdict which said: “We, the jury, find the defendants guilty as charged in the indictment and assess the punishment at fifty dollars.” When the verdict was read, and before it was received, or the jury polled, or dismissed, the court inquired whether it was intended by the verdict to fix the punishment at $50 each or $50 for both defendants. To this the foreman…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
  2. Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. State v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  4. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BurlisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  2. Durston and Fleming v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. State v. HudsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API