Legal Opinion

Durston and Fleming v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1918No. 4718PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Judge.

Appellants were each convicted of a misdemeanor and each fined $50. They were charged under article 756, Penal Code, for unlawfully practicing medicine; that is to say, not complying with the requisites of the statute, article 750, with reference to obtaining a license.

The information charges the offense jointly against both appellants and its legality is challenged upon this ground. It is not criminal to practice medicine, but it is unlawful to do so for pay without obtaining a license. A license authorized is personal to the individual. His practicing without obtaining it is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Townsend v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. State v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Chowning v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Walker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The People v. RichieIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Marina v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API