Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Heywood

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2000No. S-97-1301PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On September 17, 1997, Billy Roy Tyler (appellant) filed an action in the district court for Lancaster County, naming as defendants various State officials (the defendants). Appellant was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. His handwritten claim asserts the following:

NeB Rev Stats [sic] 83-4114 says that 15 out of 45 days . . . respite is mandated but under practices Policies of Respondents (acting in concert and under color of state law) relator Has been Held continually in solitary confinement for 400 days or so. As complained of in 557-119 Relator Has Received…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nebraska Children's Home Society v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State ex rel. Wright v. BarlowNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Pope v. PopeNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Schindler v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. McFarland v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DavidsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Matanuska Electric Ass'n v. Rewire the BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Putnam v. ScherbringNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. City of Beatrice v. MeintsNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Npimnee v. ShiffermillerNebraska Supreme Court · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API