Legal Opinion

Crossings Development Ltd. Partnership v. H.O.T., Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 1994No. 16347PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, Judge.

Plaintiff Crossings Development Ltd. Partnership has appealed from a judgment entered against it by the Summit County Court of Common Pleas granting defendant H.O.T., Inc.’s motion for a new trial in a forcible entry and detainer action. Plaintiff argued several assignments of error in its original brief to this court. After oral argument, this court asked the parties to submit briefs on the following issue:

“Whether execution of the writ of restitution rendered issues regarding the forcible entry and detainer aspect of the case moot, prior to the trial court’s ruling on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Gelfand v. StysOhio Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Haney v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Rocco v. Johnson, 06ca31 (5-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Sedlak v. City of SolonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Witkowski v. ArditiOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Dixon v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API