Legal Opinion

Maule Ojus Rock Co. v. Lumpkin

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 7, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is a writ of error from a judgment against a garnishee. Three trials were had on the issues of fact involved. Two trials resulted in verdicts for the plaintiff against the garnishee. The other was a mistrial. The first verdict for plaintiff was set aside and a new trial awarded. That ruling was affirmed by this Court on writ of error taken from the order granting a new trial. Lumpkin v. Maule Ojus Rock Co., 101 Fla. 64, 153 Sou. Rep. 344.

In the present case the motion for a new trial has been stricken on motion but a motion to strike the bill of ex ceptions was denied and a rehearing of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maule Ojus Rock Co. v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. Walker v. Mills Engineering Const, Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Lumpkin v. the Maule Ojus Rock Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coastal Bay Golf Club, Inc. v. HolbeinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API