Legal Opinion

Maule Ojus Rock Co. v. Lumpkin

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 16, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

2Per curiam

In this case the bill of exceptions against which a motion to strike has been directed, appears in the transcript properly authorized by the signature and certificate of Judge W. W. Trammell, the trial judge. No objection appears to have been made to the act of the trial judge in signing the bill of exceptions because it was out of time when it was presented for settlement and authentication. Apparently, when the bill of exceptions in question was signed and settled, every one connected with the case took it for granted that it had been presented in time and was being signed…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Greeley v. PercivalSupreme Court of Florida · 1885
  2. Rehfield v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  3. Worrell v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  4. Gulf, M. & N. R. v. Riverside Brick & Mfg. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1926

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cocoa-Rockledge Drainage Dist. v. Vans AgnewSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. Maule Ojus Rock Co. v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Farrelly v. HeuackerSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. Maule Ojus Rock Co. v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API