People v. Pearson
New York Court of Special Session
1Opinion of the Court
De Luca, Ch. J.
The appellants herein have been convicted of disorderly conduct under subdivision 6 of section 722 of the Pénal Law, and each sentenced to thirty days in the workhouse execution thereof suspended. On this appeal, they do not contest the sufficiency of the evidence. The only question raised is one of law, whether or not one who acts as an “ accessory ” or “ accomplice ” in the offense of disorderly conduct as charged herein can he convicted as a principal. It is maintained that the definition of a principal appearing in section 2 of the Penal Law applies to crimes only, either…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- People v. PerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- People v. . BlivenNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- People v. GoldfarbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- People v. BellowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. TinstonNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1957
- Erway v. MacAfferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- State v. Anonymous (1972-4)Connecticut Appellate Court · 1972
- People v. Ithaca Savings BankIthaca City Court · 1969
- People v. PleasantNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1953