Legal Opinion
People v. Tinston
New York City Magistrates' Court
Decided February 28, 1957PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Charles Solomos, M.
The complaint herein charging disorderly conduct was dismissed on the People’s ease for insufficiency of proof. It reads: ‘ ‘ that on February 20th, 1957, at the north east corner of Ovington and Fourth Avenues, in the County of Kings, about 1 p.m., City and State of New York, the defendant, Albert Tinston, committed the offense of disorderly conduct in violation of Section 722, subdivision 2, of the Penal Law, in that with intent to provoke a breach of the peace and under circumstances whereby a breach of the peace might be occasioned, the defendant was standing thereat…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Associated Press v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- People v. PerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- People v. BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- People v. CherryNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- People v. ChesnickNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. FelicianoNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1958
- People v. BrimNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1960
- Williams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. Cuvelier, New York County Courts1957
- People v. BomboyNew York Court of Special Session · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.