Legal Opinion
Harmer v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 20, 1991No. 2:91-cv-72676PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ORDER TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION
HACKETT, District Judge.
Defendants have filed a motion seeking an order to compel arbitration and a stay of proceedings in this case pending arbitration. For the reasons stated below, the court finds that defendants’ motion should be granted.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On November 8, 1988, plaintiffs and defendant Doctor's Associates, Inc. entered into a Franchise Agreement. Under the terms of this agreement the parties agreed to submit disputes to arbitration. Paragraph 10(c) of the Franchise…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carpenter v. PomerantzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- Doctors Associates, Inc. v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005