Legal Opinion
Taylor v. General Battery Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 7, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Travers, J.), entered February 14, 1991 in Rensselaer County, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover for damages allegedly sustained as the result of the explosion of an automobile battery manufactured by defendant. Defendant moved for *991summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that, although plaintiff produced a battery manufactured by defendant, he cannot establish that it is the same battery which exploded and injured him. Supreme Court denied the motion…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Otis v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Decker v. County of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Sosa v. Joyce Beverages, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Hakim v. Armstrong Rubber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Healey v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Brown v. Sagamore HotelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Herbert v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Carter v. MaskellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Duarte v. Mesta Painting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997