People v. Guzman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GOSWAMI, J. * —
INTRODUCTION
Defendant challenges his conviction on two counts of lewd and lascivious acts upon a child under 14 years old. As his sole contention on appeal, Defendant maintains the trial court prejudicially erred when it admitted a recorded telephone conversation between a defense witness and the mother of one of the victims. Defendant argues the ruling contravened the exclusionary rule stated in Penal Code 1 section 632, subdivision (d), which bars the admission of evidence obtained as a result of recording a confidential communication without the consent of all…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. CarmonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Jones v. Kmart Corp.California Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. GuzmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. MinifieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018