Legal Opinion
Ball v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 23, 1983No. Appeal No. 1; Claim No. 62167PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs, and claim dismissed. Memorandum: Claimant contends that the State’s failure to erect additional warning signs was the proximate cause of the accident which forms the basis of this action. Claimant Estella Ball, who was driving at the time of the accident, testified that she had driven this route approximately two times a week for 15 to 16 years. Both she and her husband were familiar with the intersection. The driver of the other vehicle, Donald Lucas, was also familiar with this intersection, having driven it on his way to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atkinson v. County of OneidaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hicks v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Tely v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Kent v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Kent v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by8 opinions
- Merrill Transport Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Scheemaker v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Long v. ClearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Ball v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hutley v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Claims · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.