Legal Opinion
Scheemaker v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 19, 1986No. Claim No. 66508PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: For reasons stated in the decision of the Court of Claims, we agree that the State was negligent for failing to control the speed of vehicles passing through the subject intersection and for conducting an incomplete safety investiga*965tion of the accident site prior to the accident; that the State’s negligence was a proximate cause of the accident; that claimant also was negligent for failing to observe the other vehicle which was there to be seen; and that the apportionment of liability of 75% to claimant and 25% to the State is supported…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Spier v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Atkinson v. County of OneidaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ball v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Ball v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Bailey v. County of TiogaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Grcic v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Dupell v. LevesqueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Long v. ClearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.