Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Skinner

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 18, 1990PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

On February 4, 1986, the defendant, Michael F. Skinner, was found guilty by a jury of both murder in the first degree and unlawfully carrying a firearm. He timely appealed from the murder conviction, citing as error the trial judge’s supplemental instruction in response to a jury question regarding deliberate premeditation.

Represented by new counsel, Skinner filed a motion for a new trial in this court, raising the same error as that noted in his appeal, as well as claiming that he had been denied effective assistance of counsel at trial. We remanded that motion and stayed the appeal pending…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Carella v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. WaiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. RosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. DonahueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API