Legal Opinion

Cushman v. Noe

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 14, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

It has been repeatedly pointed out that the pref*501erable equity practice is to bring questions of law to this court by appeal from final decrees and not by exceptions. McCusker v. Geiger, 195 Mass. 46, 52. Welsh v. Briggs, 204 Mass. 540, 549. Assuming in favor of the defendants that their requests for rulings were rightly presented and all their exceptions are open and considering the record on its merits, no error of law is disclosed.

This is a suit in equity by administrators of the estate of Matilda M. Chesbrough seeking to set aside a sale of personal property in form executed by her during…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Commonwealth v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. McCusker v. GeigerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Cohen v. LevyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. Welsh v. BriggsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Millett v. TempleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Zeo v. LoomisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Weinstein v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Meehan v. North Adams Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Jubinville v. JubinvilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API