Flannery v. Rohrmayer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Civil action for the sale of certain land and buildings upon which a builders’ lien had been foreclosed; brought to the City Court of the city of Hartford. Facts found and case reserved for advice. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLoomis, J.
To entitle the petitioner to a sale of the land in question he must show that he has acquired an interest in it. The only interest claimed was derived from the filing of a mechanics’ lien for services rendered to George *28Rohrmayer in the erection of a dye-house on the land, and a subsequent foreclosure of that lien.
If George Rohrmayer had any interest subject to a mechanics’ lien, then it must be conceded that the proceedings referred to had the effect to transfer that interest -to the petitioner. But he had only such interest as the law gave him by virtue of his marriage in 1863 to Mary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Flannery v. RohrmayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
- Upon the Petition of GayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Brainard v. Town of ColchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
- Fitch v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1855
- Goodwin v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1866
3Cited by2 opinions
- Montgomery v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Whittelsey v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909