Legal Opinion

Gowden v. State Employees' Retirement Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 10, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEADBETTER.

This case raises an issue of first impression concerning the interplay between two statutory provisions, one in the State Employees’ Retirement Code (Retirement Code), 1 and the other in the Worker’s Compensation Act (Act). 2 Claimant William R. Gowden petitions for review of an order of the State Employees’ Retirement Board (Board) denying his request that the State Employees’ Retirement System (SERS) provide him with a service-connected supplemental disability benefit, pursuant to Section 5704(f) of the Code. Because we believe that the Board has misconstrued…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shafer v. State Employes' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. McCormack v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harasty v. Public School Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Waters v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Parris v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Pennsylvania Highlands Community College v. State Employees' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API