Legal Opinion
People v. Lane
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 1966No. Crim. 11195PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DRUCKER, J. pro tem. *
In a nonjury trial defendant was convicted of violation of section 23101 Vehicle Code. Upon consideration of the probation report the court suspended proceedings and granted probation for a period of two years. Defendant appeals from the judgment (order granting probation) upon the grounds that the unauthorized extraction of blood while he was unconscious was: (1) An unreasonable search and seizure, (2) a violation of his privilege against self-incrimination, and (3) a violation of his right to counsel, to remain silent, and to be cautioned that any evidence given could…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Carrington v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- McDonald v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. LachmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.